Inquiry bodes ill for writers
"Copyright recognises and enshrines the value of original work." ... Tim Winton.
Jacob Saulwick National Correspondent
July 13, 2009
THE Federal Government's economic advisory body is likely to recommend scrapping copyright provisions preventing the parallel importing of books.
The Herald understands one of the proposals the Productivity Commission will present tomorrow will be to free up restrictions on book imports, after a period of up to three years to give the industry time to adjust.
If adopted, the changes would significantly change the way books were sold and, according to writers and publishers, undermine the ability of new Australian authors to land their break.
Copyright provisions are intended to protect Australian authors and publishers.
Under laws introduced in 1991 Australian publishers are given 30 days to publish a local version of any book published in the world. Bookshops must then sell the Australian version and cannot import a cheaper alternative.
In establishing the inquiry in November, the former minister for consumer affairs Chris Bowen set off a pitched battle between booksellers on one side and authors and publishers on the other.
The booksellers - through the Coalition for Cheaper Books set up by Dymocks and the retail chains Woolworths and Coles - have argued that removing copyright limits would benefit customers.
Retailers have also argued they are losing business as they struggle to compete with cheap books sold on Amazon.com.
The Productivity Commission, known for espousing orthodox economic principles, is uncomfortable with market restrictions on book imports.
But in a draft paper in March the commission said removing all import restrictions would damage the industry. Instead it advocated limits should apply for a year after a book was first published, but then be removed.
The Herald understands the final report tomorrow is likely to go further and suggest the eventual removal of all import restrictions.
Those fighting the removal are probably the country's most articulate lobby. Authors such as Tim Winton, Kate Grenville and Peter Carey have peppered the commission with submissions. Winton wrote: "Copyright recognises and enshrines the value of original work.
"Copyright is the single most important industrial fact in a writer's life, the civilising influence of a culture upon a market."
Maree McCaskill, the chief executive officer of the Australian Publishers Association, said New Zealand was the only other big market to do away with restrictions on book publishing.
And even in New Zealand, there was little evidence that it had led to lower prices.
Ms McCaskill said an open book market would be "seriously devastating" to the industry, resulting in lost jobs and fewer publishing houses.
She said publishers would be less likely to search for and nurture new authors, and instead would rely more on established names in the book industry to guarantee sales.
The executive director of the Australian Society of Authors, Jeremy Fisher, said the copyright arrangements worked well, protecting the industry at no cost to the taxpayer.
The commission's draft paper noted there was little evidence that books were more expensive in Australia than overseas.
However, it said removing restrictions was likely eventually to lead to lower prices.
